2023-09-08 08:40:20

It's also really verbose. Very keen to tell me what is DOES know while getting the actual answers incorrect.

I reckon a teacher could easily smell this out.

I know ChatGPT explicitly does not do facts. But even so, with so much easily findable information about this topic, I consider this a big fail.

Kids: Don't ChatGPT your homework.
Teachers: It's good, but it's not that good. Keep an eye out for rambling but incorrect answers!

2023-09-08 08:33:16

An example…

Q: What is the link between Shakespeare and Tottenham football club?

Chat GPT says:

"There is no direct historical link between William Shakespeare and Tottenham football club.ā€

Google says (top, snippetted result):

"The name Hotspur was picked to pay homage to Sir Henry Percy, better known as 'Harry Hotspur' from Shakespeare's King Henry IV Part 1ā€

ChatGPT also doesn't know the link with the Teletubbies. It’s too literal and not at all smart.

2023-09-08 08:30:19

Interesting. My kid gets his first piece of high-school homework. An 11-question quiz about Shakespeare.

He HAS done the homework. But I wondered: what would ChatGPT make of this?

By my reckoning, 4 of the 11 answers it gave were incorrect. And this is because some element of ā€œinterpretationā€ was required to answer the question.

The AI's aren't coming for us just yet!

Examples…

2023-09-07 17:45:59

On the one hand, given how many electronic devices now have screw-in battery covers, this neat little 4-end pocket screwdriver is a really good lifehack.

On the other hand… I seem to have turned into the dad from The Mitchell’s vs the Machines!!!

2023-09-07 08:54:51

As of this week I’m the parent of a secondary/high school student! Eek!

A tech observation: would be great if phones had a ā€œschool modeā€ where they are effectively off, but can still be geolocated. For parental tracking but also for finding lost devices.

Is that a thing?

2023-09-06 22:08:53

I really want to be working on side projects, but I’m burning so much mental energy on being executive function for other people right now that I just need to chill once kids are in bed.

And this… this is literally FINE. šŸ‘ It’s better than fine. It’s GOOD!!

2023-09-05 17:55:00

Ending this short thread with some wisdom:

Just because a programming language has weird, ambiguous syntax doesn’t mean you have to use it!

2023-09-05 17:53:07

Also, and f*** this:

You can optional-call an undefined function:

let undefinedFunc
undefinedFunc?.()

is fine.

But you can’t optional-call an undeclared one:

undeclaredFunc?.()
-> ā€œundeclaredFunc is not definedā€

Even though:

typeof undefinedFunc
-> ā€œundefinedā€

typeof undeclaredFunc
-> ā€œundefinedā€

🤬

2023-09-05 17:46:05

New JS/TS syntax that I’m learning and that I don’t like:

1) Optionally chained function calls. This is just weird:

someFunction?.( params )

2) Ambiguous short function syntax that does not return an object:

const f = () => {
ā€˜name’: ā€˜Ross’
}

2023-09-04 23:34:11

šŸ˜Ž Tooting my own horn again, but today, I – complete React and NextJS noob (kinda) – reviewed a small-but-mighty NextJS middleware change, found a bug, improved it, and then went and wrote tests for it too!

Go me!!!

(Actually very proud of myself today)

2023-09-01 23:20:08

Duolingo is so funny…

A listening exercise.

ā€œJe voudrais un ________ de vin?ā€

Options:

a) verre
b) mer

Yes. I’d like a sea of wine please!

Sounds GREAT!!

šŸ˜‚

2023-09-01 13:37:32

@jaygeorge I’m reminded that I need to say…

Great podcast this week! šŸ™Œ

I forwarded to my ACF-making friends to ensure that they received all of Ambers love and feedback.