RE: https://crikey.social/@ross/116605777298450051
You have no idea how long I spent considering the words this post. I think I went for succinct-precise. š
RE: https://crikey.social/@ross/116605777298450051
You have no idea how long I spent considering the words this post. I think I went for succinct-precise. š
You know how there is a product triangle of cheap, good and quick? Where you can only have two?
I think there is a communication triangle that is similar.
Communication can be simple, succinct and precise. Or any two of those. But never all three.
Simple, precise communication will need lots of words and not be succinct.
Succinct, precise communication will need terminology and not be simple.
And simple, succinct communication will never be precise.
(Note to family/friends/colleagues: Yes, I frequently fail hard on āsuccinctlyā, but you canāt fault my precision⦠I hope! š)
I also wonder if there is something about probably being neurodiverse and not āgettingā AI.
I donāt want to use long rambling sentences to describe what I want. I want to learn the specific meanings of things so that I can communicate precisely and succinctly.
This video, for example, is baffling: https://www.youtube.com/shorts/Z-h1HLilceQ
A while back I got frustrated with people on a school Facebook group asking simple questions of each other that were answered on the school website. I thought the fix was clever technology. But I later realised that asking other people has real value. Community. Social capital.
AI robs us of this.
Slightly less favourite-video right now is the stuff coming out of Google I/O.
Just⦠ugh. Where are the PEOPLE?
Weāre heading to Wall-E level dystopia, arenāt we?
Makes me genuinely angry.
āSam Campbellās ULTIMATE Photo Editing Tutorialā is my new favourite video on YouTube.
Iāve watched it three times today and laughed out loud every time. Iām still not sure Iāve seen all the jokes in it. 6 minutes and worth every second.
You know, Iāve been researching solar. But I asked myself the question: āIs it worth it, doing my part?ā
And then I read the tech news and Iām like: āFuck it, Iām gonna install three gas turbines, a power shower, a plastic lawn, and never bother with thinking about recycling again.ā
In an attempt the brain-hack my way to more exercise I bought Ring Fit adventure for the Switch in Vinted for £15. Seems like fun. And definitely works up a sweat!
Woah! 2nd in Memoku!!! (I could go down, but itās pretty late in the day!)
I have an idea for a tech talk called āHow your computer really works.ā that deep dives almost everything in the stack from typing a URL to having a web page displayed.
I was thinking about it as I was trying to get to sleep last night. Assuming staring at the flashing cursor in the search bar, I got from the physical key press to sending pixels to the monitor and I was done. Itās SO much.
Visited my local Maker Space open day yesterday. (Thanks, and nice to see you @castaway !)
Fun! And such a nice, friendly group of people.
Might have to join up and learn some electronics.
(Or not because I really donāt have time!!)
Iāve been doing research on garden solar. I think I have a useful system that pays for itself in about 4 years.
Part of me really wants to do this.
But part sees that there are much easier ways to save ~Ā£400/year.
Am I missing reasons to do this? Is ādoing my bitā a valid reason?
Bum. If there is one place that I donāt want AI coding.
Thereās a lot of neat apps coming out at the moment.
I like them a lot. But I am a bit suspicious: how much of these are AI assisted to the point that they may not be safe?
How do I trust what Iām installing?
Or are AI-assisted apps actually safer? And better?
I donāt know any more. Tech is so confusing. š«¤
Using dependencies in software seems increasingly fraught.
I wonder if there comes a point where we shun dependencies in software development.
Or go back to snippets or small, āfinishedā libraries that we can easily understand and reason about.
Big npm blobs seem like a bad idea!
(FWIW I already try to do this)
(And yes, you could get AI to code libraries for you. But that doesnāt seem like a good idea either!)
RE: https://front-end.social/@anarodrigues/116562197482285921
I sense that Mastodon is generally where the good people are. But Iām boosting this anyway. Men: read it and take note.
And I say this: most of the smartest, hardest-working people Iāve worked with have been women. I have learnt so much from them. You are worse off if you donāt respect them and learn from them.
It's kinda sad when folks involved in open source projects say āI don't think we should do X because agents have got really good at doing Yā.
It's mad that we decide that we should leaning into doing things the way that agents are good at.
They're supposed to be intelligent. They're supposed to be good at the things humans do. We should do the humans thing. Because humans will always be here.
This seems especially true for a project that wants to ādemocratise" things.
RE: https://mastodon.social/@jillbinder/116557538328127463
Jill did some speaker coaching for me. She's brilliant! And this sounds like such an amazing programme.
@tommertron Hey Tom! Great to see the updates to macAppLibrary. I noticed a 1.4 today.
Can I point out that the download link on https://coefficiencies.com/apps/macapplibrary/ is still for v1.0?
You can hack the URL to update the version and that works, but people can't easily get the updates.
Perhaps you know? Am I missing something?
Thanks so much – gonna try out the API today! š